Paul’s letters to the church at Thessalonica were written in the midst of great concern among the brethren regarding death, the coming of Christ and the hope of those in Christ. When we read 1 Thessalonians 4, it is evident that some among their number had died while awaiting the promised hope at the Lord’s coming. Some wondered if the death of those saints separated them from that hope in Christ. No doubt, the thought of faithful brethren having been robbed of their hope by untimely death was discouraging and depressing to the saints.

When viewed in terms of the present reality of their severe persecution, the obvious concern existed as to the ability of evil men to take away their hope by killing them (1 Thessalonians 1:6). After all, martyrdom was a present fact in the first century (Acts 7:59-60; 12:1-2; et. al.). In the midst of affliction, the saints in Thessalonica needed strength and comfort to help them live with joy and hope. Where could they find the real, lasting and substantive encouragement they needed? What could be the source for such?

A Look at 1 Thessalonians 4

The end of the fourth chapter contains the answer to our question as well as a lesson concerning how we can be encouraged. Think about these words:

“But we would not have you ignorant, brethren, concerning them that fall asleep; that ye sorrow not, even as the rest, who have no hope. For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also that are fallen asleep in Jesus will God bring with him. For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we that are alive, that are left unto the coming of the Lord, shall in no wise precede them that are fallen asleep. For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven, with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first; then we that are alive, that are left, shall together with them be caught up in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words” (1 Thessalonians 4:13-18).

In the last verse of the above text, the New International and the New Revised Standard versions read, “Therefore encourage each other with these words.” The word translated “comfort” or “encourage” in this verse is the same one translated “exhort” in 1 Thessalonians 4:1 and many other passages. The Greek word parakaleo is a combination of two words: to call plus along side of, by, or near. The literal sense of the word is found in the father’s calling of the elder brother aside entreating him to join the feast for the prodigal who had returned (Luke 15:28). When a father calls his son aside, the reason for the separation is to impart instruction, information or correction. The emphasis is not on the manner of approach, but the effect of the approach. In its general use, the Greek word parakaleo has the same connotation. The effect of being encouraged was seen as the result of the message given.

Now back to our text, notice how these discouraged and depressed Christians were to be encouraged. Paul told them to “encourage each other with these words.” He answered their feeling of discouragement with the revelation of God’s will. It was not by Paul’s style that they were encouraged, but by truth. It was not by a change in atmosphere or setting that they were encouraged, but by coming to correctly understand God’s will. As long as they had erroneous views, they could not receive true encouragement. True encouragement had to come from correction of that false idea and replacing it with truth. Hence, true encouragement came from God’s will.

Encouragement Based on Bible Instruction

This same point is found throughout this context and others inspired by God. The saints were encouraged or exhorted (parakaleo) to live properly (1 Thessalonians 4:1). How? Paul said it was “as ye received of us how ye ought to walk and to please God.” The word was the source of the encouragement. Paul prayed for all that they might be comforted in their hope (2 Thessalonians 2:16-17). How? He said it would take place “in every good work and word.” Without the word and its application in their lives, there could be no real or lasting encouragement. Elders must be able to exhort or encourage the flock (Titus 1:9). How? God told them to do it “in the sound doctrine,” adding the instruction to “convict the gainsayer” as a necessary part of the process. As they came to see the eternal truth of the God they sought to serve, they had the encouragement needed. No person, style or setting could match that given by God’s will.

A Parallel on True Encouragement

While in school, I played football in South Texas. We practiced long hours in hot weather. Our coaches drilled and instructed us hour upon hour. When we were not being instructed on specific skills used as a lineman, we lifted weights over and over. After we were tired from exhausting workouts, we ran one wind sprint after another. All of that was done to prepare us to play the game. On the day of the game, our school gathered for a pep rally. It was held in an air conditioned gym where we heard enthusiastic cheers from the students while we smiled, all dressed in clean game jerseys. The pep rally was intended to encourage us and I liked it. But at game time, I was usually faced with a big, strong, mean guy on the other side of the line that I had to block. When the fourth quarter came and I was hot, tired and bruised, it was not the pep rally with its enthusiastic atmosphere that encouraged me to block that guy I faced. It was the preparation of a coach that drilled and drilled techniques, strength and correction day after day that encouraged me to know I could do it. I knew I could do it because I had been taught properly and had done it repeatedly.

Conclusion

What is the point? We often see Christians seeking for externals to give them encouragement when they need to seek the true source. Some say they could be more encouraged by a different speaker or a different style or a different setting. They seek the spiritual equivalent of a pep rally. The simple fact is this — Christians are brought to real and lasting encouragement in and through the truth of God. It is not accomplished by pop psychology, an enthusiastic style of speech or artificial changes in atmosphere. Such trappings may make one feel more enthused for the moment, but the feeling will not last. True encouragement comes from God’s word. When we fail to study and learn and grow, we are weak and depressed. When we let the word dwell within us richly, it will show in our speech and actions (Colossians 3:16-17). No externals can match the encouragement in the gospel of a Savior who was crucified for us.

Need some encouragement? Pick up your Bible and study. Go to an meeting nearby and hear a lesson of truth which will point you to God’s will and correct you from wrong. Find a sinner and teach him. Look for a brother or sister to serve. You will find true encouragement and impart it rather than blaming others for a problem caused by self.

Repentance is a change of mind or heart. By repentance, then, we mean the work accomplished by the word of God in the heart of man, whereby he has a changed attitude toward sin and God. “For godly sorrow worketh repentance unto salvation…” (2 Cor. 7:10). Thus, we learn the cause of repentance.

By salvation, we mean the forgiveness of sin. It makes no difference whether we have in mind the sin of an alien or the sin of a child of God. Of course, the forgiveness of sin here looks to the eternal state of heaven. Having clearly made known what we have in mind by the two terms of our study, we are ready to consider the relation they sustain to each other.

It is not our aim here to study all the conditions of salvation imposed upon men, so we are not suggesting that repentance is the only condition unto salvation. Indeed, repentance is not possible, and even if it were it would not be acceptable to God, unless we first believed. “But without faith it is impossible to please him; for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.” (Heb. 11:6-7). So repentance cannot take place until one has become a believer in God, and in the plan of God to save man.

Also the Scriptures teach us that the only way to get into Christ and to put on Christ is to be baptized into Him (Gal. 3:26-27). We then need to do more than repent in order to complete our part of obedience to the plan of salvation.

Christ said, “I tell you nay, but except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.” (Lk. 13:3). Words could not be more direct than these and they leave no doubt at all as to repentance being a condition of our salvation. According to Christ, then, repentance must take place in our hearts before we can receive salvation or the forgiveness of sin.

It is not only true that we must repent, but this command is universal in its application to all men. “And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men everywhere to repent because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead.” (Acts 17:30- 31). Here we have repentance set forth as a condition of righteousness before Christ in the day of judgment and that for all men. Man who has not repented of his sins cannot be considered righteous before God in the final judgment. A failure to repent means one will be rejected in that great day. Repentance, then, is essential in the judgment if we are to be saved eternally.

When the day of Pentecost was come, following the ascension of Christ to glory, men for the first time heard the full gospel of Christ, and having heard, they believed. Upon this belief, they cried out, “Men and brethren what shall we do?” (Acts 2:37). They were believers already, for it was that belief that prompted them to cry out. Then Peter answered their question in inspired words: “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of sins.” (Acts 2:38). Thus, the Holy Spirit declared through the inspired Peter in the first gospel sermon that repentance is a condition of salvation. All of Peter’s hearers were to repent, and they were all to be baptized in order to have the remission of sins.

Simon the sorcerer is an example of a Christian who sins to whom the command to repent also applies. “And Simon also himself believed: and being baptized, he continued with Philip.” (Acts 8:13 ASV). “Now when Simon saw that through the laying on of the apostles’ hands the Holy Spirit was given, he offered them money, saying, Give me also this power, that on whomsoever I lay my hands, he may receive the Holy Spirit. But Peter said unto him, Thy silver perish with thee, because thou hast thought to obtain the gift of God with money. Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter: for thy heart is not right before God. Repent therefore of this thy wickedness, and pray the Lord, if perhaps the thought of thy heart shall be forgiven thee.” (Acts 8:18-22 ASV).

Here we have an example of one who had become a child of God, but who had sinned. In this case — as in the case of the alien sinner — repentance is a condition of salvation. No, not the only condition, for the Christian must pray for God to forgive him of the thought of his heart. But before he prays, he must repent of his sin. Therefore, whatever the state or condition we are in, or the relationship we have with God, when we sin, we must repent of our sin if we are to be forgiven. Repentance is a universal condition of salvation to all who have sinned.

In the great commission, Jesus said remission of sins is a universal offer to all who repent (Lk. 24:46-47). Men must therefore repent if they are to be saved. Where there is no repentance, there is no salvation.

Repentance is not suggested as an act of pleasure, or something easy, but something we must do if we are to be saved. Repentance demands restitution. When one has repented, he has the desire to restore that which he has destroyed. When he was converted, Paul went about rebuilding the church which he had before tried to destroy. A man could not steal an automobile, repent of his theft, and keep the automobile. Such a state of heart would not be a state of penitence. We cannot substitute good acts on our part for true repentance. We must repent and allow a truly penitent spirit to produce the fruits meet for repentance in our lives.

Premillennialism teaches that when Jesus came to earth, He came to set up a physical kingdom in which He would reign as both a spiritual and political leader.  But since He was rejected by the Jews (Matt. 12), Jesus had to change His plans.  Consequently, the church was established until Jesus could come again to reign as King on earth.  This interpretation denigrates the church as simply a “Plan B” put into place at the last minute because of His supposed failure the first time around.  Premillennialists refuse to recognize that the church is the kingdom.

The New Testament clearly teaches that the church was part of God’s plan from eternity past.  “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love, having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will, to the praise of the glory of His grace, by which He has made us accepted in the Beloved.  In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace” (Eph. 1:3-7).  The key to understanding Ephesians 1 is to understand what it means to be “in Him,” “in Christ,” “in the Beloved,” etc.  Predestination and election are not individual, but corporate.  Election in Christ takes place in the church, to which any honest, obedient soul may become a part.  We are reconciled “in one body” (Eph. 2:16), and it is in that body (the church) is where Saints dwell (Eph.2:19-22).  It is the church that was purchased with the blood of Jesus (Acts 20:28), and through His blood we have redemption (Eph.1:7).  Therefore, redemption and predestination are in the church.  The church is no “Plan B.”

God has also made clear the purpose of the church: “to the intent that now the manifold wisdom of God might be made known by the church to the principalities and powers in the heavenly places” (Eph. 3:10).  It is the church that is to make known “the manifold wisdom of God.”  The only “organization” authorized in the Scriptures to do this is the local congregation.  Where is the authority for any human organization to take the work of the church away from the church?  Had the phrase “by the church” been omitted from this passage one might argue generic authority for human organizations.  But the phrase “by the church” specifies the “organization” that is to make known the manifold wisdom of God.  This specific excludes any other option, i.e. human organizations.

Of course, individual Christians may work together to promote the cause of Christ.  “When Aquila and Priscilla heard him, they took him aside and explained to him the way of God more accurately” (Acts 18:26).  Some tell us that so long as money is not taken from the local church treasury that we can form human institutions to do the work of the church. But individual action, even concurrent individual action, is not to be confused with corporate (or organizational) action.  Organizations have structure, a hierarchy usually in the form of a president or board of directors (what passage speaks of their qualifications?).

The word “church” is used in several different ways in the New Testament, though we most often use it to refer to either the universal church (Matt. 16:18) or the local congregation (1 Cor. 1:2; 1 Thess.1:1).  The two concepts are distinct, yet related.

The “universal church” refers to all of the saved in all places at all times.  The universal church has no earthly headquarters, leaders, or treasury.  It is not intended to function as a single entity on earth.  It simply describes the fellowship that individual Christians have with God (1 Jn. 1:6-7).  When the Bible speaks of “one body” (Rom. 12:4-5; Eph. 4:4), which is the church (Col. 1:18, 24), it is not referring to one local congregation, but one body of believers.  In Acts 2:47 we read, “And the Lord added to the church daily those who were being saved.”  Obviously, the Lord does not add Christians to congregations (that’s done by agreement between the local church and the individual, Acts 9:26-28).  When one’s sins are forgiven fellowship is established with God and they are added to the church.

There is not just one “local church,” but many (Rom. 16:16).  Each congregation determines it’s own fellowship (Acts 9:26-28), as dictated by Scripture.  The authority of the eldership is limited to the local church only (1 Pet. 5:2).  Though local churches cooperated in a common cause (1 Cor. 16:1), they did so independently, without violating their own autonomy.  There was no directing entity to oversee their work.

Many believe that the universal church is made up of all of the local congregations combined.  This concept is seriously flawed.  If it were true, then to be a member of the universal church (and therefore in a saved condition) one would simply have to gain membership to a local church.  Inversely, if one were not a member of the local church, he would be outside of the universal church.  The eunuch was baptized and “went on his way rejoicing” (Acts 8), yet he was clearly not a member of any local church at that point.  He was still reconciled in one body (Eph. 2:16) and added to the church (Acts 2:47).

The institutional controversy of the past generation was more than a simple discussion about autonomy and the proper use of the local church treasury.  Those men defended the local church as the only organization fit to carry out the work.  In 1949 William Thompson wrote, “No human organization can supplant the church of Christ, for God’s only missionary society is the New Testament church.  There is no other institution that can give to men and women the spiritual blessing that are found only in Christ and the church. (Eph. 1:3, 23) . . . . Local congregations were the medium through which this work was carried on in the days of the apostles of Christ.  They are the only missionary organizations that one reads about in the New Testament church in apostolic days.”  Earl West taught the same in 1950, “The individual congregation of Christ’s disciples is the only missionary society known to the scriptures.”  These men are not cited as authority, for there is no authority but  that which comes from God’s word.  But as the old saying goes, “Those who don’t study history are bound to repeat it’s mistakes” (Judges 2).

The new institutionalism facing the Lord’s church today has nothing to do with local church treasuries.  Local churches are bypassed and appeals for money are made directly to the universal church.  The organization then does the work of preaching and evangelism.  If this is not centralization, what is?

Some have argued, “But where does the Bible say that individually supported human organizations are wrong?”  Where does the Bible say that ham sandwiches and chocolate milk for the Lord’s Supper are wrong?  This is an appeal to negative authority, the silence of the Scriptures.  Martin Luther (and many since) took the position that “anything that is not expressly condemned is authorized.”  This approach to authority has led to the 2,500+ denominations we see today.  The question is not why is something wrong, but why is it right?  Where is it authorized?  “And whatever you do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through Him” (Col. 3:17).  Logically, one who affirms a position has the burden of proof, not the one who denies.  If any human organization can be established to do the work of the church let it be shown from the Scriptures.

Brother West also wrote in 1950, “In the restoration movement, brethren began to think in terms of the church universal and, with that concept, formed a missionary society.  Looking back on this history, as we can now, who can fail to see that this society became the master and soon dictated to the churches, a prerogative which belongs only to Christ.”  In 1949 Foy E. Wallace, Jr. (before he fell away) warned, “The fight against societies, organizations, centralizations of authority, and all that belongs to digression in general, so valiantly made in Tennessee and Texas fifty and sixty years ago, shall be fought all over again.  The Lord has many thousands yet who have not bowed the knee to Baal—and shall not!”

Let us never glorify any human institution by giving it the work God intended for the church.  “Now to Him who is able to do exceedingly abundantly above all that we ask or think, according to the power that works in us, to Him be glory in the church by Christ Jesus to all generations, forever and ever. Amen” (Eph. 3:20-21).

In Jn. 8:1-11 we have recorded the story of the woman taken in Adultery: “1 But Jesus went to the Mount of Olives. 2 Now early in the morning He came again into the temple, and all the people came to Him; and He sat down and taught them. 3 Then the scribes and Pharisees brought to Him a woman caught in adultery. And when they had set her in the midst, 4 they said to Him, ‘Teacher, this woman was caught in adultery, in the very act. 5 ‘Now Moses, in the law, commanded us that such should be stoned. But what do You say?’ 6 This they said, testing Him, that they might have something of which to accuse Him. But Jesus stooped down and wrote on the ground with His finger, as though He did not hear. 7 So when they continued asking Him, He raised Himself up and said to them, ‘He who is without sin among you, let him throw a stone at her first.’ 8 And again He stooped down and wrote on the ground. 9  Then those who heard it, being convicted by their conscience, went out one by one, beginning with the oldest even to the last. And Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst. 10 When Jesus had raised Himself up and saw no one but the woman, He said to her, ‘Woman, where are those accusers of yours? Has no one condemned you?’ 11 She said, ‘No one, Lord.’  And Jesus said to her, ‘Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more.’ “

What lessons are we to learn from this event?  Was Jesus justifying a sinner in her sin?  Was He teaching that we are to tolerate (ignore) some sins?

The intent of the scribes and Pharisees was to set a trap for Jesus.  They believed that they had come up with a dilemma that would get Him in trouble regardless of how He responded.  If Jesus had said, “Stone her,” they would have told the Romans who did not allow capital punishment without their permission.  Had He said, “Free her,” they could have accused Him of contradicting the law of Moses.

What Did Jesus Mean?

Jesus answered, “He who is without sin among you, let him throw a stone at her first” (v. 7).  This answer has been interpreted in various ways.  Some have taken this to mean that all of the Jews present were guilty of adultery, and therefore none were in a position to condemn her without condemning themselves.  While this is possible, it seems unlikely that a group of staunch Jews were all guilty of adultery.  Others have understood this to mean that only the sinless could throw the first stone.  Obviously, this is not so since such a requirement would have eliminated any man (other than Jesus) from carrying out the death penalty at any time.  Still others believe that Jesus is demonstrating that mercy is more important than strictly adhering to the law.

In considering the meaning of Jesus’ answer let’s remember two basic principles.  First, Jesus lived without sin, His life was in perfect compliance with the Law of Moses.  He did not advise anyone at anytime to violate that law, since such would make Him complicit in their sin.  Second, many have the notion that Jesus tolerated, and will continue to tolerate, some sin.  John 8 is used as evidence of that.  But nothing could be further from the truth.  Consider what Jesus Himself said: “But I say to you that for every idle word men may speak, they will give account of it in the day of judgment” (Matt. 12:36), “For the Son of Man will come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and then He will reward each according to his works” (Matt. 16:27), and “For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled” (Matt. 5:18).

Jesus had no earthly authority to unilaterally pronounce judgment or punishment on this woman.  That was the purpose of the law of Moses (Num. 5:11ff; Deut. 22; etc.).  The law further stated, “Whoever is deserving of death shall be put to death on the testimony of two or three witnesses; he shall not be put to death on the testimony of one witness. The hands of the witnesses shall be the first against him to put him to death, and afterward the hands of all the people. So you shall put away the evil from among you” (Deut. 17:6-7).  Testifying as a witness had serious implications.  If the witnesses were lying in a death penalty case, they would not only be guilty of perjury but also of murder.   And that could bring death upon the witnesses (Deut. 19:18-19).

So, it seems that Jesus directed His comment to the witnesses, they were to cast the first stone.  In other words, Jesus told them to proceed according to the law of Moses.  In doing so, He placed the dilemma back on them.  If they stoned her, they would have to answer to the Romans.  If they failed to stone her, they would be in violation of the law.

Why Did The Crowd Leave?

Perhaps a better question is “why did they not stone the woman?”  Obviously, they were not interested in justice since the man involved in this act of adultery was not brought forward.  This situation was simply used as a trap for Jesus.  Further, verse 9 says that they were convicted by their conscience.  The implication of Jesus’ words pointed out that they willingly set aside God’s law to appease the Romans and to trap an innocent Man.   They had just enough conscience to realize what their actions meant.

Notice also that Jesus does not deny that the woman was guilty of this sin.  But now was not the time for judgment.  Jesus did not need to come to earth to condemn man (Jn. 3:17), because man already stood condemned (Gal. 3:22; Rom. 3:9-12, 23).  His purpose was to free man from sin and it’s consequences.  However, the time is coming when all men will be judged by the words of Jesus (Jn. 12:48).

All sin condemns us before God.  James wrote, “For whoever shall keep the whole law, and yet stumble in one point, he is guilty of all.  For He who said, ‘Do not commit adultery,’ also said, ‘Do not murder.’ Now if you do not commit adultery, but you do murder, you have become a transgressor of the law” (2:10-11).  The Calvinist doctrine of the “Continual Cleansing” denies the force of this passages.  Those with Calvinist leanings say that a single act of sin will not condemn us, only habitual sin will.  But James points out that we will stand before God as either guilty of sin, or pronounced righteous by the mercy of God.  This principle is recognized by every court system on earth.  If one is found guilty of stealing, he will not successfully argue for his freedom because he has never committed arson, murder, or assault.  The criminal stands before the court as innocent or guilty.  We will stand before God as having all our sins forgiven or as “a transgressor of the law.”  There is no middle ground.  A single act of unforgiven sin brings condemnation.

Sin is usually connected with some type of pleasure (Tit. 3:3; Heb. 11:25), if such were not the case there would be no basis for temptation.  Satan uses our weaknesses to entice us to sin, “But each one is tempted when he is drawn away by his own desires and enticed” (Jms. 1:14).  The word translated “enticed” is deleazo, which means “to lure by a bait” (W. E. Vine).  The first time we succumb to temptation the easier it is to give in thereafter.   Before we know it, sin becomes habitual.  Jesus recognized this when He said, ”Most assuredly, I say to you, whoever commits sin is a slave of sin’“ (Jn. 8:34).  The verb “commits” is present, active which describes one who continues in sin.  Being a slave of sin does not mean that it is impossible to break away (Col. 3:5-7), but the task is much more difficult.  There are things we can do to overcome habitual sin.

Repent and pray for forgiveness. This is what Peter told Simon to do (Acts 8:22), and it is essential whether we’ve committed a single act of sin or are involved in habitual sin.  Every time a Christian does this in sincerity of heart his sins are forgiven.

The word “repent” is often misunderstood.  Strong defines it this way: “to think differently or afterwards, i.e. reconsider (morally, feel compunction)” (#3340).  Strictly speaking repentance is a change of mind.  There are other things that accompany repentance.  Godly sorrow is not repentance, but precedes it: “For godly sorrow produces repentance leading to salvation, not to be regretted; but the sorrow of the world produces death” (2 Cor. 7:10).  Many feel “the sorrow of the world.”  They are sorry for the consequences of their sin, but not for the offense that they have caused God or others.  Their repentance is not valid because it is not accompanied by godly sorrow.  Repentance is also not reformation of life.  Changing the way we live is necessary after we repent (Matt. 3:8; Acts 26:20), but a changed life alone does not indicate repentance.  If one converts to Mormonism, he may change from a life of immorality to one that is morally upright.  Yet, he would still stand opposed to God.  God does not accept partial repentance.  To repent is to make our thinking come in line with God’s in all things.

Peter also told Simon to “pray God if perhaps the thought of your heart may be forgiven you” (Acts 8:22).  While God knows what we need before we ask (Matt. 6:8), He still wants us to communicate that need to Him.  And the greatest need man has is forgiveness.

Confess your sins. The N.T. speaks of two areas where confession is essential.  First, we must confess our faith in Jesus (Rom. 10:9-10; Acts 8:37).  This is something Christians should do throughout our walk on this earth.

Second, we are to confess our sins.  In the case of public sin, public confession is necessary: “Confess your trespasses to one another, and pray for one another, that you may be healed. The effective, fervent prayer of a righteous man avails much” (Jms. 5:16).  The word confess (exomologeo) means “of a public acknowledgment or confession of sins” (Vine).  Too often, men who commit public sins want their repentance and confession to be private.  And, too many brethren are willing to assume that repentance has taken place when there may be little outward evidence of such.  The problem with these views is that they ignore the command for public confession.

But the Scriptures also teach us that we are to confess our sins to God.  John wrote, “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” (1 Jn. 1:9).  Here the word confess (homologeo) means, “to confess by way of admitting oneself guilty of what one is accused of, the result of inward conviction” (Vine).  To acknowledge our sins to God is to recognize our reliance upon His grace and mercy and acts as a  reminder that God does not overlook sin (Hab. 1:13; Acts 17:30).

Study what the Bible says about the things that tempt you. “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness” (2 Tim. 3:16).  The reason two-thirds of the Bible is corrective is that God knows that man gives in to temptation easily.  If we choose not to study we are rejecting God’s correction.

We are far less likely to sin if we have a clear understanding of the Bibles teaching concerning those things that tempt us.  Strength to overcome temptation comes from God’s word: “Blessed is the man Who walks not in the counsel of the ungodly, Nor stands in the path of sinners, Nor sits in the seat of the scornful; But his delight is in the law of the LORD, And in His law he meditates day and night. He shall be like a tree Planted by the rivers of water, That brings forth its fruit in its season, Whose leaf also shall not wither; And whatever he does shall prosper.” (Ps. 1:1-3).  Those tempted by alcohol should have a clear understanding of passages like Prov. 20:1; 23:29-35; 1 Cor. 6:9-11; Eph. 5:18-20, etc.  Those addicted to sexual immorality need to see the physical, spiritual, and emotional damage that they do to themselves and others by studying Prov. 5:3-14; 7:1-27; 1 Cor. 6:15-20, etc.  Remind yourself often (2 Pet. 1:12-15).

Avoid tempting situations. Jesus clearly taught, “And do not lead us into temptation, But deliver us from the evil one.” (Matt. 6:13).  Notice that He did not say, “and do not lead us into sin,” but “into temptation.”  Sin is less likely to occur where there is no temptation.  James describes the connection between temptation and sin: “But each one is tempted when he is drawn away by his own desires and enticed. Then, when desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, brings forth death.” (1:14-15).  Satan (the tempter, 1 Thess. 3:5) entices us through our weaknesses, but he has no power over us beyond what we allow him (Jn. 13:2, 27; Acts 5:3).

One of our greatest temptations is to flirt with temptation.  We know that we must avoid sin, yet we are drawn by its pleasures.  Jesus warned against allowing our minds to dwell on sin (Matt. 5:21-48).  And James tells us that doing so makes us double-minded: “Therefore submit to God. Resist the devil and he will flee from you. Draw near to God and He will draw near to you. Cleanse your hands, you sinners; and purify your hearts, you double-minded. Lament and mourn and weep! Let your laughter be turned to mourning and your joy to gloom. Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and He will lift you up.” (4:7-10).

Turn to your brethren for support. “No man is an island,” according to the old saying.  And it’s true!  We often need encouragement to remain faithful: “Beware, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief in departing from the living God; but exhort one another daily, while it is called “Today,” lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin.” (Heb. 3:12-13).  Those that are mature in the faith have the responsibility of helping and encouraging those struggling with sin (Gal. 6:1-2; 1 Thess. 5:14).

Remember, “Blessed is the man who endures temptation; for when he has been approved, he will receive the crown of life which the Lord has promised to those who love Him” (Jms. 1:12).

At first the name sounds impressive. The American Civil Liberties Union. Judging by the name, one might get the impression that this is a patriotic, fair-minded group of people who are concerned with the freedoms and rights of all Americans. Indeed, that is the way they promote themselves. However, upon closer inspection one realizes that they are neither patriotic nor fair-minded. The ACLU is comprised of 250,000 contributing members, 5,000 volunteer attorneys, and 70 staff attorneys. They have an average case load of 6,000 cases at any one time. They have an annual budget of $14,000,000, most of which is supplied by the American taxpayer through the Civil Rights Attorneys Fee Awards Act of 1976 (1). The ACLU has defended every immoral act that one can imagine. They are one of the most powerful lobbies in the nation and, by their own admission, one of the most hated.

The History of the ACLU

The ACLU was founded by Roger Baldwin. Baldwin was born on January 21, 1884 in a wealthy, prominent, Boston family. The two most influential people in Baldwin’s youth were his grandfather and aunt. His grandfather, William Henry Baldwin, was an out-spoken atheist. Baldwin would later credit his grandfather for many of his “liberal and “nonconformist (1)’ views. His aunt, Ruth Standish Baldwin, was a member of the Socialist Party. Baldwin said of her: “She shared my radicalism, but in her own more respectable way” (2).

In later years, after his graduation from Harvard University, Baldwin would be influenced by three strong-willed, independent women: Anna Louise Strong, Margaret Sanger, and Emma Goldman.

Baldwin met Anna Louise Strong in 1910. After a short courtship they were engaged to be married. The engagement ended when Baldwin refused to give up drinking and smoking. However, the two stayed in touch and remained friends for the rest of their lives. Following the Bolshevik Revolution, Strong renounced her American citizenship and moved to Moscow.

In 1915, Baldwin met Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. Sanger

believed in improving the human race by voluntary and involuntary birth control and sterilization (3). (This is a direct application of Friedrich Nietzshhe’s concept of the “Superman.” It is no accident that there are certain correlations between Nazi Germany and Planned Parenthood. Both stem from the philosophy of Nietzsche. (4)) Sanger opened the first birth control clinic in Brooklyn in 1916. Almost singlehandedly, she laid the foundation for abortion, euthanasia, fetal experimentation, surrogacy, and organ harvesting. Sanger once wrote, “Funds that should be used to raise the standard of our civilization are diverted to the maintenance of those who should never have been born. More children from the fit, less from the unfit – that is the chief issue of birth control.” Sanger and Baldwin were also lifelong friends.

Baldwin first met Emma Goldman during one of her lectures on humanism. She taught him about the self-sufficiency of man and the relativity of all morals. Goldman advocated violent revolution, political assassination, and Marxist Populism. Baldwin later said that she was “one of the chief inspirations of his life.”

In October of 1917, Baldwin founded the Civil Liberties Bureau. After an investigation by the FBI, the Bureau was raided and Baldwin was sent to prison for sedition. When he was released, he reopened (and renamed) the American Civil Liberties Union, on January 20, 1920.

Over the past 70 years, the ACLU has been involved in many landmark cases. The following are but a few selected ones.

1920 – The Palmer Raids Case: The ACLU combated Attorney General Mitchell Palmer over the deportation of a number of resident aliens who had been convicted of violent labor disruptions or who had been proven to be actively involved in various communist subversive activities.

1933 – The Ulysses Case: The ACLU led the anti-censorship battle over a novel by English author, James Joyce, which had been banned because of U.S. obscenity laws.

1950 – Loyalty Oaths Campaign: The ACLU fought McCarthy era requirements that public officials forswear any involvement with communist or subversive organizations.

1962 – Regent’s Prayer Case: In this case, one of several anti-prayer suits that the ACLU was involved in, lawyers argued that a prayer recited each day in the New York public schools, constituted an unlawful “establishment of religion.”

1973 – Doe vs. Bolton: In this “manipulated test case,” the ACLU led the legal fight that, in conjunction with Roe vs. Wade, overturned the restrictive abortion laws in all fifty states.

1977 – The Skokie March: The ACLU defended the right of American Nazis to march through a predominantly Jewish suburb of Chicago.

1989 – Equal Access Act: The ACLU was successful in making voluntary student prayer or Bible study meetings before or after school the one exception to the Equal Access Act of 1984. So, while students may gather in public schools to discuss Marxism, view Planned Parenthood films, or hold gay activist meetings, they may not pray or read the Bible. (5)

With Liberty and Justice for Whom?

Barry Lynn, the ACLU’s Legislative Director said: “There is clearly a distinction made between religious speech and activity and any other speech and activity. There is an establishment clause which limits and tempers only religious speech and activity. There is no establishment clause which in any way limits economic, cultural, historical; or philosophical expression. Thus, the state may embrace any economic, political or philosophical theory; it may not embrace or enhance any religious activity.” (6)

In other words, according to the ACLU, since there is a separation of church and state, the state may have no involvement with any religious group and may not hold to any religious dogma. The state should be totally indifferent to the church. But was this the intent of our founding fathers?

George Washington: “It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the Bible.”

Patrick Henry: “The Bible is worth all other books which have been printed.”

Andrew Jackson: “That book, sir, is the rock on which our republic stands.”

U.S. Grant: “The Bible is the sheet-anchor of our liberties.”

Thomas Jefferson: “The Bible is the corner stone of liberty.” (7)

Separation of church and state simply means that one will not govern the other. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas said it best: “We guarantee the freedom to worship as one chooses. We make room for as wide a variety of beliefs and creeds as the spiritual needs of man deem necessary. We sponsor an attitude on the part of government that shows no partiality to any one group and that lets each flourish according to the zeal of its adherents … To hold that it may not, would be to find in the Constitution a requirement that the government show a callous indifference to religious groups. That would be preferring those who believe in no religion over those who do believe. . . . The First Amendment does not say that in every and all respects there shall be a separation of church and state.” (8)

Very clearly it is the intentions of the ACLU to stifle religion. Christianity, in particular, is diametrically opposed to their humanist philosophy.

Links with Communism

The goal of the ACLU is communism. Reading a list of the founding members of the ACLU is like reading a Who’s Who of the American Communist Party. Norman Thomas was the

Socialist Party’s candidate for President and a board member of the ACLU. Morris Hillquit was the director of the National Executive Committee of the Socialist Party and a member of the ACLU’s first National Committee. Other founding members include William Foster, Chairman of the Communist Party USA, Max Eastman, editor of the Communist Party’s The Masses, and Harry F. Ward, prominent Communist Party member. Baldwin himself admitted in a 1976 interview that “Communism is the goal.” (9)

The ACLU claims to be interested in the rights of all men. In fact, they are only interested in promoting their own humanist ideas.

1. Grant, George, Trial and Error. Brentwood: Wolgemuth and Hyatt, 1989 p.154.

2. Ibid, p.53-54.

3. Alcorn, Randy. Christians in the Wake of the Sexual Revolution. Portland: Multnomah Press, 1985 p.39.

4. Ferm, Vergilius, ed. Encyclopedia of Religion. Paterson: Littlefield, Adam and Co., 1964 p. 535.

5. Grant,George. Ibid, p. 24-28.

6. Policy Review. September 1988.

7. Halley’s Bible Handbook. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1965 p. 18.

8. Grant, George. Ibid, p.73.

9. Lamson, Peggy. Roger Baldwin: Founder of the ACLU. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976 p.192.

God designed marriage to be for life (Matt. 19:6). God’s overall view of divorce is that He hates it (Mal. 2:16). However, if a mate’s spouse commits fornication, God allows the innocent mate to divorce the guilty spouse and remarry without sin (Matt. 5:31,32; 19:9; Mk. 10:11-12; Luke 16:18).

So many people in our country have either never heard or read those passages, or disregard them as irrelevant if they have. Divorce is rampant. Many divorce for no reason except they are tired of living with their present spouse. When such remarry they commit adultery (see above passages). While God gives a mate whose spouse commits adultery the right to divorce and remarry, even then one does not necessarily have to exercise that right. Genuine repentance on the part of the guilty spouse and longsuffering and forgiveness on the part of the offended spouse can go a long way in keeping a marriage in tact, even following the heartache of an adulterous affair. It would seem that this is especially important if children are involved.

God’s pattern for rearing children is for them to have their own mother and father. However, because of recalcitrant immoral mates, innocent spouses have no choice except to divorce and rear their children as single parents. On other occasions spouses whose mates sought divorce when no fornication was involved and when they themselves did not desire divorce are still left with the task of rearing children alone. More times than not custody is awarded to the mother, leaving little or no contact with the father. Given the character of some fathers, this is good.

God’s pattern can not be improved upon. A child needs both parents. Recently one attended a class on human development for elementary certification in which a counselor gave a number of statistics concerning the effects of divorce on children. Here are the statistics.

Children need their Fathers

• Nearly 4 out of every 10 children are being raised without a father.
• Among long-term prison inmates, 70% grew up without a father, as did 60% of rapists and 75% of adolescents charged with murder.
• Fatherless children are 3 times more likely to fail at school, require psychiatric treatment, and commit suicide before the age of 18.
• They are also 40 times more likely to experience child abuse than children in 2-parent homes (due to increased stress on the mother and increased time left with other relatives or friends).

Effects of Divorce

• 63% show some sort of psychological problem (anxiety, sadness, moodiness, phobia, and depression) to a much greater extent than children with other types of problems.
• 56% have poor grades or a significant drop in grades compared to before-divorce figures.
• 43% show increased aggression toward parents.

Effects on Female children

Among teenage and adult females whose parents divorced when they were children:

• Most suffered lower self-esteem.
• Most were precociously involved in sexual relations.
• Many had delinquent-type behavior.
• Most had difficulty with the trust of a partner and consequently difficulty establishing and maintaining a lasting adult heterosexual relationship.

Statistics

• In 1995, 18.9 million children lived with only one parent (27%) and 60% of those were with their mother.
• Of children living with one parent, 38% lived with a divorced parent (as opposed to a parent who was widowed or had a spouse working over-seas, etc)
• 4 million children live with their grandparents. In only 1/2 of the cases, one parent also lives there and in 37% neither parent was there.
• Most single-parent children live in metropolitan areas (14.5 million).
• Nearly 60% living with only their mother were at or below the poverty line.
• Children living with a divorced father were more likely to be a part of a family with a higher median income than those with mom.
• 85% of fathers granted custody of children were white rather than black.
• Most fathers granted custody were older than their wives.
• Most custodial fathers were better educated than their wives.
• Children are 70% more likely to experience criminal acts (abuse, rape, etc) when living with a step-father.

Children who are murdered by a parent are 99% more likely to be murdered by a step-father than a biological parent or step-mother.

If everyone on earth could realize that since God created man, He knows man completely, within and without. Therefore, He knows what is best for man. Divorce is not best! The above statistics show what God said all along.

What can we do to prevent divorce and its impact, especially on children? The following are some suggestions.

1. Before marriage, choose one to marry who is a Christian and who is deeply convicted as to the permanence of marriage (Matt. 19:6). Be convicted yourself!

2. Do not let “divorce” be a part of our vocabulary when discussing your own marriage.

3. Carry out God’s word relative to how we should treat our mates (Matt. 7:12; I Cor. 7:1-5; Eph. 5:22-34; Col. 3:18-19; I Pet. 3:1-7; Proverbs & Song of Solomon).

4. Realize that any marriage, even between people who serve the Lord, requires work. Sacrifices, communication, and consideration of the other mate’s feelings must be paramount. Otherwise, enticements of the world can tempt one or both parties to divorce.

5. Learn to apologize. We all make mistakes. Take full responsibility for your actions.

6. Learn unselfishness. Most problems occur in marriages because one wants his/her way to prevail without consideration of the other. When a couple has children and a mate divorces for no reason, or commits adultery, is obstinate, etc. and children are going to suffer, but the man/woman insists on his/her course of action, such a person is nothing but selfish! He/she is only thinking of him/herself.

Let us make our marriages as God planned and revealed in His word for our good here and in the hereafter, as well as for our children.
via Elgin Hills Examiner, Nov 2008

Brethren have long pointed out that “preaching Jesus” means preaching baptism for the remission of sins (Acts 8:35-36). Paul warned the Corinthians that when “we preach Christ crucified” some would stumble and others would consider it foolishness (I Corinthians 1:22-23). While many in the denominational world agree that belief (John 8:24), repentance (Acts 17:30-31), and confession (Romans10:9) are necessary for the forgiveness of sins, they still stumble and consider it foolishness when baptism is preached.

Much time, energy, and imagination has gone into making the Bible not say what it clearly does. Men have twisted scripture and sound reasoning to defend human tradition. We will consider some common arguments made against baptism, and how we might respond to them. These are in no particular order.

“Baptism is a work, and we’re not saved by works (Ephesians 2:8-9).”

There are many ways to respond to this. First, consider the context Ephesians 2. Most will stop reading at verse 9, but consider what verse 10 says: “For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.” To the sectarian mind this poses a contradiction. Verse 9 says that salvation is “not of works,” while verse 10 says that we were “created…for good works.” Obviously, there are two different kinds of works under discussion. Verse 9 is referring to meritorious works while verse 10 has in mind the works of God. All “works” are not the same.

Second, most believe that salvation is by faith only. But the only place where the phrase “faith only” is found is James 2:24: “You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only.” Does James contradict Paul? No, each is dealing with an opposite extreme. The fact is that both teach the same thing from different views.

Third, the view that we’re saved by faith and not by works is contradicted by Jesus in John 6:28-29: “Then they said to Him, ‘What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?’ Jesus answered and said to them, ‘This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent.’” Logically, if we are not saved by works, then we cannot be saved by faith, for Jesus says that faith (belief) is a work.

“If what you are saying about baptism is true, then my dear, departed grand- mother is lost.”

This is actually not an argument since it does not deal with any points of Scripture. A good response might be to ask a series of questions.

(1) “Was your grandmother an honest, sincere person?” (Hint: everybody answers “yes.”)

(2) “If she understood what you now understand, would she have obeyed?”

(3) “What do you think she would want you to do (Lk. 16:28)?”

(4) “Will your rejection of the Scriptures change what is true and save her?”

“The Bible says that we’re saved by the blood of Christ (Ephesians 2:13; Hebrews 9:13-14; I Peter 1:18-19), not by water”

This is a false dichotomy. The assumption is that we are saved by one or the other, but not by both. Calvinism teaches that salvation is solely a work of God, and that man has no part. That presupposition is reflected in this argument. In fact, the blood of Christ is what God has provided, but God expects us to choose salvation and meet His righteous conditions. “There is also an antitype which now saves us-baptism (not the removal of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God), through the resurrection of Jesus Christ” (I Peter 3:21). We are saved by the blood of Christ, but access to His blood is through obedience to the gospel.

“Mark 16:16 doesn’t say, ‘but he who does not believe and is not baptized will be condemned.’ Therefore, belief is the only thing necessary for salvation.”

First, there is a logical progression to the order given by Jesus. One will not (and cannot) be baptized if is there is no belief. “Baptism” without belief is simply dipping in water, and is of no religious significance (Romans 10:10; I Peter 3:21).

Second, the fallacy of this argument can be easily shown with an illustration like this: “He who boards the plane and takes the flight will be in Phoenix, but he who does not board the plane will be left behind.” Does it need to be said, “and does not take the flight” for the message to be clear? If one does not board the plane, then one cannot take the flight. Likewise, if one does not believe, then one cannot be scripturally baptized. Further, if we follow our objector’s reasoning to its logical conclusion, then the moment we have boarded the plane we are in Phoenix (whether we’ve taken the flight or not).

Third, we must focus on what Jesus is saying. Is He saying, “He who believes and is saved will be baptized,” or “He who is baptized and saved will believe,” or “He who believes and is baptized will be saved”? Let’s let the text speak for itself.

“Paul said that Christ didn’t send him to baptize (I Corinthians 1:17), therefore, baptism is not essential to salvation.”

The key to properly understanding I Corinthians 1:17 is to recognize that this is a “not . . . but” passage. In this kind of passage, the “not” part of the verse is de-emphasized in order to emphasize the “but” portion. However, we shouldn’t necessarily come to the conclusion that the “not” statement is a prohibition. Consider John 6:27, which has the same “not . . . but” construction: “Do not labor for the food which perishes, but for the food which endures to everlasting life. . .” Jesus is not telling His disciples not to work, as this would contradict passages such as Ephesians 4:28; I Thessalonians 4:11; II Thessalonians 3:10; etc. He is emphasizing “the food which endures to everlasting life” as being far more important than “the food which perishes.” The same thing is found in Matthew 10:20 when Jesus gave instructions to His disciples as they preached to Israel: “for it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father who speaks in you.” The disciples did the physical speaking, but they were simply the instrument of the Spirit who was speaking through them. The Spirit is emphasized as the source of their words. When Paul says that “Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel,” he is neither prohibiting nor undervaluing the importance of baptism. He is simply pointing out that his primary duty was to preach. Those who were converted and baptized were part of the “increase” given by God (I Corinthians 3:7).

“The thief on the cross wasn’t baptized, and he was saved.”

Baptism for the remission of sins did not begin until the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:37-38), so the thief (and Jesus) lived under the law of Moses. Paul is very clear on when the law of Moses came to an end, “having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us. And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross” (Colossians 2:14). Since baptism was not a requirement for salvation under Moses, it was not necessary for the thief.

“Baptism is an outward sign of an inward grace.”

This is another way of saying we should be baptized because our sins are already forgiven. But the Bible nowhere teaches salvation before baptism.

“The ‘for’ in Acts 2:38 means ‘because of’”

Many have attempted to twist Acts 2:38 (“Repent, and let everyone of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins….“) by saying that “for” (eis, in Greek) means “because of” rather than “in order to.” While a study of original language is very profitable in this instance, most are not prepared to argue from the Greek. A better response might be to note that Matthew 26:28 has the same grammatical construction as Acts 2:38. Jesus said, “For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins” (Matthew 26:28). If eis means “because of” in Acts, then it also means “because of” in Matthew. And, if that’s the case, Jesus is saying that His blood would be shed because man’s sins have already been forgiven (i.e. the blood of Christ is not necessary for forgiveness). Of course, those who make this argument are not willing to follow it to its logical conclusion.

That baptism is the point at which salvation comes is made clear in many passages.
“And now why are you waiting? Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord” (Acts 22:16). “There is also an antitype which now saves us-baptism… ” (I Peter 3:21). “He who believes and is baptized will be saved… ” (Mark 16:16).

“New Testament baptism (Acts 2:38) and the baptism of the Holy Spirit (Acts 1:5) are the same.”

While there are many different baptisms mentioned in the New Testament, there is only one (Ephesians 4:5) that is required today, and it is not the baptism of the Holy Spirit. First, the baptism of the Holy Spirit is a promise not a command. Notice the words of Jesus: “Behold, I send the Promise of My Father upon you; but tarry in the city of Jerusalem until you are endued with power from on high” (Luke 24:49). The parallel to this is found in Acts 1:4-5, “And being assembled together with them, He commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the Promise of the Father, ‘which,’ He said, ‘you have heard from Me; for John truly baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now.’” One obeys a command, not a promise.

Second, the baptism of the Holy Spirit is recorded only twice, in Acts 2 and 10. When Peter returned to Jerusalem, he recounted the conversion of Cornelius to the rest of the church. In Acts 11:15, he said, “And as I began to speak, the Holy Spirit fell upon them, as upon us at the beginning.” Many would like to change the phrase “at the beginning” to “from the beginning.” That small change would indicate that the baptism of the Holy Spirit occurred continually throughout the entire period. But, alas, the text says what it says.

In the end, when all of man’s arguments are put forth the New Testament still teaches that we must be baptized to be saved. And, many still stumble at the preaching of Jesus.

By Loving Your Mate

by Chris Reeves

Parenting begins with parents. Parents joined in marriage are to children what a foundation is to a house. If you want your children to grow up strong with the right values, then you, as parents must provided them with the right foundation from the beginning. God provided for the home by first creating one man and one woman to be joined in marriage. These two joined in marriage were to be fruitful and multiply (Genesis 1:26-28). The order is this: a godly marriage first, then children. So, how can parents love their children? They can love them by loving their mate. The Apostle Paul wrote that the older women were to teach the younger women “…to love their husbands, to love their children…” (Titus 2:4). Loving your children and loving your mate go hand in hand.

Love Your Children

By Maintaining a Godly Marriage

Marriages built upon God’s word will result in children being raised the right way. Do you have enough love for your children to begin and maintain a godly marriage? Marriage begins with one man and one woman for life (Genesis 2:18-25; Matthew 19:4-6). This kind of marriage is honorable among all (Hebrews 13:4).

There are problems when children are brought into the world without a godly set of parents guiding them. The percentage of out-of-wedlock births increased 511 percent from 1960 to 1997.[1] And, the percentage of single-parent families more than tripled during this time.[2] Between 1960 and 1997 the marriage rate decreased 33 percent.[3] Children born out of wedlock and to single parents often end up as juvenile delinquents because they do not have the nurturing they need from a godly father and mother. Even if two parents are present in the life of a child, it is possible for these parents to neglect the child to the point of shame (Proverbs 29:15). God wants two godly parents – one man and one woman living the way God directs – to be fruitful and multiply. Parents who are first directed by God’s word will be able to “train up a child in the way he should go” (Proverbs 22:6). What if your marriage is not built upon the principles of God’s word? Fix it! Do you love your children enough to correct any wrongs in your marriage?

Maintaining a godly marriage also takes time together. Wise Solomon wrote, “And rejoice in the wife of thy youth” (Proverbs 5:18), and again, “Live joyfully with the wife whom thou lovest all the days…” (Ecclesiastes 9:9). Peter wrote that a godly husband and wife are “heirs together of the grace of life” (1 Peter 3:7). Marriage is a “one flesh” relationship (Genesis 2:24; Matthew 19:5-6; Ephesians 5:31). You may be married with children, but you must also spend some time during the day together with your spouse rejuvenating your relationship. Enjoy life together! Yes, raising children involves time, but parents must also put a priority on their own time together. Time spent together physically and spiritually will help parents to meet the challenges of raising children. Remember, partnership comes first, then parenthood.

Love Your Children

By Setting the Right Example

Children see what parents do, and hear what parents say. Parents, do you love your child enough to set the right example for them? All the passages of Scripture that apply to Christians setting the right example for the world would certainly apply also to parents setting the right example for their children (Matthew 5:12-13; Philippians 2:15-16; 1 Timothy 4:12; 1 Peter 2:12). Parents, if you want to know how your children will turn out tomorrow, take a good look at yourself today. Like father like son … like mother like daughter (Ezekiel 16:44). The best lesson you can teach your children outside the word of God is a godly example. Do you know that over 90 percent of a child’s influence comes from the home? You cannot rely on society, public schools, friends, local churches, or even other Christians to set the right example for your children. You must do it!

Parents, your children will see the bad in your marriage. Your children will see and hear you when you fuss, fight and insult one another. They will hear you when you lie, murmur and complain, use profanity, or when you tear down church members. They will see you if you are lazy or dishonest. They will also watch you as you put drugs, alcohol or tobacco into your body. They will see all your character flaws and imitate them (Romans 1:24-32; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10; Galatians 5:19-20; Ephesians 4:25 – 5:5; Colossians 3:5-9). Remember, deeds often speak louder than words. What message are your children hearing from you?

Parents, your children will see the good in your marriage. This of course, is what God desires. Mothers, your daughters will see how you submit to your husband as the church submits to Christ and they will grow up to do the same (Ephesians 5:22-24; Colossians 3:18; Titus 2:5; 1 Peter 3:1-5). Godly mothers will also exemplify respect for the father (Ephesians 5:33; 1 Peter 3:2). Your children will see how you help your husband (Genesis 2:18,20). They will see your modest demeanor (1 Timothy 2:9-11; Titus 2:5) and how you love them and your husband (Titus 2:4). Fathers, your sons will see how you honor, cherish and love your wife as Christ loved the church and they will grow up to do the same (Proverbs 12:4; 31:28-29; Ephesians 5:25-33; Colossians 3:19; 1 Peter 3:7). Godly fathers will not provoke a child (Ephesians 6:4) or show bitterness toward the mother (Colossians 3:19). Godly fathers will also set the right example of a loving leader (head) in the home (Genesis 3:16; 1 Corinthians 11:3; Ephesians 5:23).

Setting the right example for your children begins with being a Christian yourself. Are you a Christian? Are you a faithful Christian? Do you love your children enough to show them the importance of being a faithful Christian? Why would your children want to be saved if you are not? Why would they want to live right and go to heaven if you are not living right? Why would they want to attend worship services regularly if you do not? Why would they be motivated to pray and read the Bible regularly if you do not? Why would they want to put God’s kingdom first if you do not? Why would they want to help others or share the gospel if they do not see you doing it? Parents, you need to follow the example of Paul who followed Christ and became a faithful Christian (Acts 26:29; 1 Corinthians 11:1; Philippians 3:17; 4:9), only then can you set the right example yourself for your children. If you are not a Christian, or if you marry a non-Christian, it will be difficult to raise your children in the right way. Parents, don’t just talk your values, walk your values.

Love Your Children

By Sharing the Responsibility

Parenting takes two. God has given the responsibility of raising children to both the mother and the father. Yes, mothers are to “rule the household” (1 Timothy 5:14) and be “workers at home” (Titus 2:5). But, fathers are given the responsibility of nurturing the children in “the chastening and admonition of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:4). There are many times when a mother has to raise the children without the help of the father and vice versa. In some cases, the mother is too quick to avoid her duty of managing the home by seeking secular work outside the home, or the father is too busy with his work and hobbies to help care for the children. This is not according to God’s plan. Fathers and mothers, do not let the responsibility of raising your children fall solely on your mate. Help each other as much as you can. Take your part seriously, and fulfill it completely each day. “Children are a heritage of the Lord” (Psalm 127:3) for the mother and the father. Both have the responsibility to care for the children.

Love Your Children

By Remaining Committed

At the end of the 20^th Century, approximately forty percent of all first marriages in the United States ended in divorce. The divorce rate has more than doubled since 1960. America has the highest divorce rate of Western nations. Almost one of every ten adults is divorced. The number of children involved in divorce in 1995 was 1.05 million. Sadly, about three of five divorcing couples have at least one child.[4] What a tragedy! Many suffer from a divorce including the children. A man and woman should remain committed to each other after they vow to be married. They should do this because they love God’s word, because they love each other, and because they love their children. Divorce and remarriage for any cause (except for the cause of fornication) is contrary to the New Testament (Matthew 5:31-32; 19:3-9; Mark 10:1-12; Luke 16:18; Romans 7:2-3; 1 Corinthians 7:10-11) and results from disrespect for God’s word, selfishness and a lack of desire to work out problems.

Children are often hurt in divorce because they no longer have a permanent father or mother. Children of divorce often exhibit conduct problems, psychological maladjustments, and lower academic achievement. They are more likely to drop out of school and engage in premarital sex during their teen years.[5] Children of divorce often slump into confusion, guilt, regression, separation anxiety, misbehavior, sadness and disillusionment, feeling deprived, anger, sexual tension, identity problems, false security, depression, fear, isolation or grief.[6] Married couples with children seeking a divorce need to sit down and seriously contemplate the consequences of their actions. An unlawful divorce and remarriage that goes unrepented will damn the soul and harm the children. Married couples who truly love God, each other and their children will remain committed to each other for life (Proverbs 2:17; 5:15ff). Jesus said, “What God hath joined together, let not man put asunder” (Matthew 19:6).

There are a number of ways you as a parent can show your love for your children. You can love them by teaching and training them and by providing for them. You can also love them by loving your mate. Maintain a godly marriage, set the right example for your children, share the responsibility of raising them, and remain committed to each other.

Questions

1. What is God’s divine arrangement for the home (Genesis 1:26-28)?

2. Mothers must learn to love whom (Titus 2:4)?

3. Maintaining a godly marriage will do what for the children?

4. Why is it important for married couples to spend time together?

5. Why is a parent’s example important to the child?

6. List some bad examples that parents can set for their children.

7. List some good examples that parents can set for their children.

8. Why is it important for both parents to be faithful Christians?

9. What responsibility in raising children does the mother have (1 Timothy 5:14; Titus 2:5) and the father have (Ephesians 6:4)?

10. How common is divorce today?

11. What kind of divorce is contrary to New Testament teaching?

12. How does divorce affect children?

13. Why is it important for married couples to remain committed to each other for life?

Chris Reeves

4922 Ogg Road

Cedar Hill, TN 37032

chrisreeves@juno.com

[2] Ibid. page 57.

[3] Ibid. page 63.

[4] Ibid. pages 68-72.

[5] Ibid. page 72.

[6] Children of Divorce, pages 39-73 (Zondervan Publishing House, 1992).

(Historical Lineage)

Some denominations claim the ability to trace their historical lineage (an unbroken link of churches throughout history) directly to John the Baptist. Of course, this is impossible to do and is a false claim. The Lord’s church was not in existence while John was alive.

John, himself, said,

“In those days John the Baptist came preaching in the wilderness of Judea, and saying, Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand! For this is he who was spoken of by the prophet Isaiah, saying: The voice of one crying in the wilderness: Prepare the way of the Lord; Make His paths straight. And John himself was clothed in camel’s hair, with a leather belt around his waist; and his food was locusts and wild honey. Then Jerusalem, all Judea, and all the region around the Jordan went out to him and were baptized by him in the Jordan, confessing their sins. But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, Brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Therefore bear fruits worthy of repentance, and do not think to say to yourselves, We have Abraham as our father. For I say to you that God is able to raise up children to Abraham from these stones. And even now the ax is laid to the root of the trees. Therefore every tree which does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire . I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. His winnowing fan is in His hand, and He will thoroughly clean out His threshing floor, and gather His wheat into the barn; but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire” (Matthew 3:1-12).

John was a prophet, pointing to Jesus and the kingdom yet to be built. Of John, Jesus said,

“As they departed, Jesus began to say to the multitudes concerning John: “What did you go out into the wilderness to see? A reed shaken by the wind? But what did you go out to see? A man clothed in soft garments? Indeed, those who wear soft clothing are in kings’ houses. But what did you go out to see? A prophet? Yes, I say to you, and more than a prophet. For this is he of whom it is written: Behold, I send My messenger before Your face, Who will prepare Your way before You. Assuredly, I say to you, among those born of women there has not risen one greater than John the Baptist; but he who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he” (Matthew 11:7-11). How could John be so great and yet “the least in the kingdom be greater than John?” Very simply, John was never to see the kingdom of which he prophesied. He was beheaded by Herod before the kingdom (church) was established.

John was beheaded by Herod (Mt. 14:1-10).

Jesus promised to build the church in a future time, after John’s death (Mt. 16:13-19).

The church actually began in Jerusalem after the death of Christ (Acts 1, 2).

No church, Catholic or Protestant, can trace its historical lineage to New Testament times. The oldest denominations are too young in age to be a New Testament church. How far back can the roots of denominations be traced? Notice the following dates of origin:

1. Roman Catholic Church – Rome, 606 A.D., with Boniface III as pope.
2. Lutheran Church – 1520 A. D., Germany, with Martin Luther’s writings as authority.
3. Episcopalian – 1534, England, when Henry VIII broke with Roman Catholicism.
4. Presbyterian -1536, Switzerland, led by John Calvin.
5. Congregational -1550 A.D., England, by Robert Browne.
6. Baptist – 1607, Holland, by John Smythe.
7. Methodist – 1739, England, by John Wesley.
8. Latter Day Saints (Mormons) – 1830, America, by Joseph Smith.
9. Adventists – 1830, America, by William Miller.
10. Christian Scientist – 1866, America, by Mary Baker Eddy.
11. Jehovah’s Witnesses – 1872, America, by Charles T. Russell.

As a matter of fact, at the time Jesus built his kingdom (church), no denomination of any kind was in existence. The church of Jesus Christ was established in 33 A.D., in the city of Jerusalem on the first Pentecost after the resurrection of Jesus (Acts 1, 2). Any denomination that had its origin by another founder than Jesus cannot be the church that belongs to Christ. Any denominaton that is younger than 33 A.D. cannot be the Lord’s church. Any denomination that was begun in another location than Jerusalem cannot be the Lord’s church. Any denomination that follows a creed other than the Bible cannot be the Lord’s church. Notice the Biblical history of the Lord’s church:

Subject of Prophecy: Distant Fulfillment promised.

• 2 Samuel 7:12-16 – the kingdom to be in David’s lineage (Christ).
• Isaiah 2 – the kingdom to begin at Jerusalem.
• Daniel 2 – the kingdom to begin in the days of Roman kings.
• Joel 2 – the kingdom to begin with power from the Holy Spirit.

Subject of Prophecy: Near Fulfillment promises.

• Mt. 3:2 (Mk. 1:1-8) – John, the kingdom is at hand.
• Mk. 1:14-15 – Jesus, the kingdom is at hand.
• Mt. 16:13-19 – Jesus, the kingdom is promised.
• Mk. 9:1 – Jesus, the kingdom to be established in life-time of hearers.

Prophecy fulfilled – the kingdom of Christ is established at Jerusalem.

• Acts 1-2 (notice 2:30-31) – throne of David established at Jesus’ resurrection.
• Acts 2:47 – saved people added to the church in Jerusalem.
• Col. 1:13 – people continually added to the kingdom (church)

churches of Christ listed in New Testament as in existence during apostles’ life.

• Jerusalem – Acts 1:36-47; 6:1; 8:1-4
• Judea and Samaria – Acts 1:8; 8:5; 9:31
• Uttermost parts of the earth – Acts 1:8
• Gentiles added to the church – Acts 10, 11, 15
• Antioch – Acts 11:19-24
• Asia Minor
• Paul’s first missionary journey: Acts 13:1-28
• Paul’s second journey: Acts 15:36-16:5 (Macedonian call)
• Europe
• Paul’s third journey: Acts 18:23–21:8
• Rome – Romans 1:1-7
• Corinth – 1 Cor. 1:1-2; 2 Cor. 1:1-2
• churches of Galatia – Gal. 1:1-2
• Ephesus – Eph. 1:1-2
• Philippi – Phil. 1:1-2
• Colossae – Col. 1:1-2
• Thessalonica – 1 Thes. 1:1-2; 2 Thes. 1:1-2
• churches in private homes – 1 Cor. 16:18; Col. 4:16, etc.
• seven churches of Asia – Rev. 1:10-3:32

Thus, overwhelming evidence exists in scripture to prove that the church foreseen by the prophets and promised by Jesus actually started in Acts 2 in Jerusalem and spread throughout the Roman Empire and beyond in New Testament times. Yet, as the New Testament ends, not a single denomination existed!

However, the Holy Spirit testified that the Lord’s church would become divided, that apostasy (a great falling away from the faith) would occur. The apostle Paul warned the Ephesian elders that such division would come (Acts 20:17-31).

Forces of division were already at work in Corinth during Paul’s lifetime (1 Cor. 1:10-13). The Holy Spirit expressly testified about a “departure” from the faith (1 Tim. 4:1-6; 2 Tim. 4:1-4). The apostle John warned of those who, though in the church, were not satisfied with the truth but who placed themselves above the truth (the Gnostic heresy) – 1 John 1; 2 John 9-11; 3 John 9. Satan was at work to combat the church by creating division among believers. This division remains to this day, growing worse as more denominations are formed.

The first full-fledged denomination, distinct from the church of Jesus Christ was the Roman Catholic church (see 1 Tim. 4:1-3; 2 Thes. 2:1-15). The first pope (an office unknown to the New Testament), Boniface III, was appointed in 606 A.D. (600 years after the Lord’s church began). This was a culmination of many departures from truth. Note the following traditions of men that led to the beginning of Roman Catholicism: church councils; hierarchy (diocesan bishops, cardinals, popes, synods, monks, nuns, convents, monasteries, etc.); holy water (about 120 A.D.); doctrine of penance (about 157 A.D.); worship of Mary (about the 4th century); doctrine of Purgatory (5-6th century); extreme unction (6th century); celibacy of priests and nuns (11th century); sale of indulgences (12th century); instruments of music in worship (666 A.D.); sprinkling for baptism (introduced in 3rd century, but fully adopted in 1311); plus the use of the Rosary, lighting of candles, burning of incense, sacramental system, Christmas, Easter, Lent, prayers to dead saints, etc.

Contrary to the teachings of Catholicism, Peter was never a pope. He was married, an equal among equal apostles, and rebuked by Paul for sins (Gal. 2:11-14). The church was not built upon Peter (a mere man), but upon the confession of the deity of Jesus as the Son of God, the true rock (Mt. 16:13-19).

As Roman Catholicism grew, it became abusive and authoritarian, forbidding common people (non-priests) to read the Bible, denying them access to God’s grace except by the sacerdotal system of a corrupt priesthood. Religion plunged into darkness, persecution, and ignorance. Creeds, traditions of men and superstitions bound people to error while truth was withheld from them.

In these centuries of “dark ages,” men arose who “protested” against the doctrines and practices of Roman Catholicism. From this crucible of persecution and error came a religious uprising known historically as the “Protestant Reformation.” At the front of the battle was Martin Luther (followed by many others) who attempted to “reform” the apostate church. Unsuccessful at reform, their efforts led to a splintering of the Catholic church. Lutherans, Episcopalians, Presbyterians, etc. all had their beginnings as competing creeds were formed to explain departures from the Catholic church. These Protestant churches further divided, divided again, and continue to divide today. In America, there has been an explosion of denominations, too numerous to mention, but numbering in the hundreds. Most of us have become accustomed to the situation, not realizing that this is, indeed, a far cry from the unity that was intended for believers in Christ.

In this cauldron of boiling religious division, we need to recall the words of Jesus about the unity which we have failed to cultivate. He said:

“Sanctify them by Your truth. Your word is truth. “As You sent Me into the world, I also have sent them into the world. “And for their sakes I sanctify Myself, that they also may be sanctified by the truth. “I do not pray for these alone, but also for those who will believe in Me through their word; “that they all may be one, as You, Father, are in Me, and I in You; that they also may be one in Us, that the world may believe that You sent Me.”

In keeping with this, the apostle Paul commanded unity:

“Now I plead with you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment. For it has been declared to me concerning you, my brethren, by those of Chloe’s household, that there are contentions among you. Now I say this, that each of you says, “I am of Paul,” or “I am of Apollos,” or “I am of Cephas,” or “I am of Christ.” Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?” (1 Cor. 1:10-13).

The Bible outlines the completeness of unity in Eph. 4:1-6:

“I, therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you to walk worthy of the calling with which you were called, with all lowliness and gentleness, with longsuffering, bearing with one another in love, endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called in one hope of your calling; one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.”

Thus, Jesus prayed for unity, that “all believers might be one.” Paul instructed that we should “all speak the same thing,” “that there be no division,” and that we all be “perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.” This unity is found in the one body of Christ, the church (Eph. 4:4-6; Eph. 1:22-23). It is to our shame today that Jesus’ prayer goes unanswered, that Paul’s instructions remain unheeded. Denominationalism, so common and accepted, is wrong and sinful. There has to be a way of unity for believers in Jesus Christ.

How Does the church of Christ Relate to This Division?

In early America, different religious leaders arose in diverse parts of pioneer days, that were appalled by the division around the world. They realized that believers could never be united as human creeds, traditions and superstitions existed. These men began to raise a plea for the complete abandonment of human creeds, with a return to New Testament Christianity. Rather than reform denominations, they suggested a restoration of the New Testament church in the twentieth century! Among these leaders were Alexander and Thomas Campbell, immigrants from Scotland. As they began to preach a restoration to New Testament Christianity, other men (independent from the Campbells) were teaching the same thing by tossing out the creeds and accepting the Bible as the sole guide of faith and practice in religion. Reacting to this message with fervor, many thousands responded to this pure Bible teaching. Just as recorded in the Book of Acts, men and women in America were baptized upon repentance and confession of their faith in Jesus and were added to the Lord’s church. The church of Christ, identical to the faith and practice of the New Testament church, exists throughout the world today as it did in the days of the apostles.

Historical Lineage for churches of Christ?

No one who understands the Bible makes the claim for authentication of modern churches of Christ by a historical, unbroken link that connects back to Jerusalem. It cannot be done, historically, nor is it necessary that it be done to recognize the Lord’s church today. How is it valid, then, for us to claim spiritual identity as the church of Christ without this link? What right do we have to say that we belong, spiritually and organically, to the Lord’s church?

First of all, Jesus taught the validity of New Testament Christianity for all ages when he gave the “Great Commission” (Mt. 28:18-20). The gospel was to be for “the whole world” until the “end of the ages.” The gospel is for all ages of time, for all nations, for every tribe, for every tongue. Faithful men in the first century were instructed to teach future generations (2 Tim. 2:2).

As the gospel of Christ is proclaimed in its purity, without the addition of creeds (Gal. 1:6-9), its simple message (1 Cor. 1:19–2:13) becomes the “power of God unto salvation” (Rom. 1:16). Within the gospel is a divine power that is called “the seed” (Luke 8:1-15) by which spiritual life is generated in every age, wherever the gospel is proclaimed. No self-appointed clergy has the right to reject those who do not recognize their ecclesiastical oversight. Jesus is the head of the church (Eph. 1:22-23), and it is His right to determine who is saved and who is in His fellowship. The power of the gospel, the seed (Lk. 8:11) generates life wherever it is sown. Disciples are made when they obey the gospel (Mt. 28:18-20) and the Lord adds them to His church (Acts 2:47). As individual saints are born by the word, they meet with others saints in a locality in order to work and worship as New Testament Christians did. In this fashion, wherever the gospel is preached, churches of Christ will appear.

THE CHURCH OF CHRIST

A local church of Christ is simply a congregation that belongs to Christ. It is organized after the New Testament pattern of “elders, deacons and saints” (Phil. 1:1). All creeds of men are rejected and the Bible is the only standard of faith and practice. As the gospel is planted in the hearts of honest men and women (Luke 8;11; Rom. 1:16), new Christians are born (John 3:1-5; Rom. 6:1-7). Upon the instructions of the New Testament, Christians meet on the Lord’s day for the Lord’s supper (Mt. 26:26-30; Acts 20:7; 1 Cor. 11:23-29), singing (Eph. 5:19; Col. 3:16), prayers (Acts 12:5), study of the scriptures (Acts 15:7-21) and giving contributions for the Lord’s work (1 Cor. 16:1-2).

Each congregation is independent from every other congregation, claiming its autonomy under Christ (Phil. 1:1; 1 Pet. 5:1-2). It recognizes no earthly head, belongs to no association of churches, stands free from denominational churches and supports no human institutions.

It recognizes its God-given responsibility to preach the gospel according to its own ability, to provide edification to its own members, and to provide benevolence for its own needy (Acts 6) and for those saints in need in other places (1 Cor. 16:1-2; 2 Cor. 8, 9).

As the early disciples “went everywhere preaching the word” (Acts 8:4), so do 20th Century Christians. Please consider the following material as a short explanation of God instructions to man for Salvation. It is important we answer through scripture what God require of us that we might be saved.

How Does One Become A Christian?

Hear the Gospel

Jesus said, “Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to him anddine with him, and he with me” (Rev. 3:20). The Lord is inviting you into His kingdom. He also said, “I am the good shepherd,” and he is the “door of the sheep” (John 10:7, 11). He invites the lost into the fold of safety, for danger is outside. For the lost, Jesus is the good shepherd that leaves the “ninety and nine” and looks for the “sheep that is lost,” for “the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost” (Mt. 18:11-14). Jesus’ sheep hear his voice and follow him (John 10:27-28) for eternal life. How do the sheep hear the voice of Jesus? We are “called by the gospel” (2 Thes. 2:14), which is “power of God unto salvation” (Rom. 1:16). It is by the word of God that faith is produced in the hearts of the lost (Rom. 10:17). Have you heard the gospel?

Believe

As the gospel story is read (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John), Jesus is shown to be the Son of God (Jn. 20:27-31). Our faith rests in Him. We must believe that He is the Son of God, sacrificed for our sins (Mt. 16:13-16; John 8:24). Do you believe?

Repent of Sins

All of us have sinned (Rom. 3:23) and have died spiritually because of sin (Rom 6:23). We must face our sins and repent. Repentance is a change of mind, followed by a change of life, as illustrated in Matthew 21:28-31. The son “repented” (changed his mind) and “went” (changed his life). This repentance is required before one can be saved (Lk. 13:3-5; Acts 2:36-38). Have you repented?

Confess the Name of Jesus

Jesus warned that we must have the courage of our faith to openly confess Him with the mouth, an oral confession (Rom. 10:10). If we do not have this courage, Jesus will not confess our name as brethren (Mt. 10:32-33). People in the New Testament times confessed Jesus’ name (Acts 4:10-12; 8:37). Have you confessed that Jesus is the Son of God?

Be Baptized

Yes, baptism is a Bible doctrine, commanded by Jesus (Mt. 28:18-20; Mk. 16:15-16; Luke 24:48). Baptism is not administered as a “rite of the church,” as a work of human righteousness or merit, but as an act of faith (Mk. 16:16; James 2:17, 18, 20, 24). Regardless of the animosity toward baptism in the denominational world, and in spite of their denial of its place in salvation, it is administered by the authority of Jesus for the remission of sin.

Baptism is a burial (Rom. 6:1-7; Col. 2:12) in water (Jno. 3:1-5; Acts 2:38; Acts 8:38). It is for (unto, toward) the remission of sins (Acts 2:38) and is viewed in scripture as involved in “washing away sins” (Acts 22:16; 1 Pet. 3:21). It is understood by Bible students that forgiveness is not in the water, but in the blood of Christ (Mt. 26:26-28; Rom. 6:1-7). However, Jesus has placed the opportunity of reachin that blood in the act of baptism. It is at baptism that the sinner mets the blood of Christ, that the old man of sin dies, and the new birth takes place (Rom. 6:1-7; Jn. 3:1-5).

Baptism is a re-enactment of the sinner for what Jesus did for him (death, burial and resurrection, 1 Cor. 15:1-4). The sinner obeys, in baptism, a “form of the gospel” (Rom. 6:16-18) in that he becomes dead to sin as he repents, is buried in baptism, and arises to a new life in Christ (Rom., 6:1-7). There is no other act of obedience in the New Testament that so fittingly portrays the gospel in our life as baptism. It is an act of faithful obedience (Rom. 1:5; Jn. 6:28-29; 8:39), not an act of merit or of human righteousness (Tit. 3:5). At the time of baptism, Jesus forgives our sins by the power of the blood and adds us to His church (Acts 2:38, 47). Have you been baptized?

Now That I’m A Christian

Disciples of Jesus wear no denominational names or support denominational doctrines. You are not Baptist, Methodist, Catholic, etc. No such names or denominations existed when Jesus built His church, and you now belong to that church (Mt. 16:18; Acts 2:47). The name of “Christian” is given for you to wear, and you glorify God in that name (Acts 11:26; 4:12; 1 Pet. 4:14-15).

As a Christian, you will meet with other Christians for worship and service (Heb. 10:25; Acts 2:42; 9:26-28; Eph. 4:11-16).

Christians begin as “babes” in Christ, having been born again (Jn. 3:1-5; Rom. 6:1-7; 1 Pet. 1:22-23; 1 Pet. 2:1-2). Each grows toward being a mature Christian (Eph. 4:11-15). They no longer live in sinful life-styles as in the past (Col. 3:1-17; Gal. 5:19-24). A Christian grows by adding the attributes of grace (2 Pet. 1:2-11).

Are you a Christian?